V_CW_UMA (spirou_offline_udem)

This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 21:20:02.723239 (UTC)

Back to the object table

Contents

Target info

This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=V_CW_UMA

Target Information

RA

167.9646773 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Dec

33.53695455 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Finder chart

[FINDER CHART]

Teff

3198.0 [K] (2019ApJ…878..134K)

Spectral Type

M3.5V (2009ApJ…699..649S)

Proper Motion (RA)

-176.1041406 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Proper Motion (Dec)

116.4325711 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Parallax

74.86141804 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Radial Velocity

2.34 [mas/yr] (2018MNRAS.475.1960F)

Aliases

1RXS J111151.8+333213, 2MASS J11115176+3332111, ASCC 585783, CSV 1710, G 119-62, GJ 3647, Gaia DR2 758200712885953280, HAT 228-00237, LSPM J1111+3332W, NLTT 26581, PLX 2604.01, PM J11118+3332S, RBS 949, RX J1111.8+3332, SV* P 719, SV* SVS 314, StKM 2-708, TIC 85334035, UCAC4 618-048637, USNO-B1.0 1235-00200538, V* CW UMa, [GKL99] 235, [RHG95] 1742, [ZEH2003] RX J1111.8+3332 1, ASCC 585783, CSV 1710, GJ 3647, RBS 949, SV* P 719, SV* SVS 314, V*CWUMA, V_CW_UMA, [RHG95] 1742, [ZEH2003] RX J1111.8+3332 1, 1RXSJ111151.8+333213, 2MASSJ11115176+3332111, ASCC585783, CSV1710, G119-62, GJ3647, GaiaDR2758200712885953280, HAT228-00237, LSPMJ1111+3332W, NLTT26581, PLX2604.01, PMJ11118+3332S, RBS949, RXJ1111.8+3332, SV*P719, SV*SVS314, StKM2-708, TIC85334035, UCAC4618-048637, USNO-B1.01235-00200538, V*CWUMa, [GKL99]235, [RHG95]1742, [ZEH2003]RXJ1111.8+33321, ASCC585783, CSV1710, GJ3647, RBS949, SV*P719, SV*SVS314, V*CWUMA, VCWUMA, [RHG95]1742, [ZEH2003]RXJ1111.8+33321

OBJECT name(s) in headers

V* CW UMa

PI name(s) in headers

Ryan Cloutier

Project/Run name(s) in headers

20AC25

Spectrum

This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.

LBL

No LBL reduction found

CCF

This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.

../../../_images/ccf_plot_V_CW_UMA_spirou_offline_udem.png

CCF stats

Mask used

GL699_neg.fits

CCF systemic velocity

2508.51 \(\pm\) 12.13 m/s

CCF FWHM

5577.59 \(\pm\) 21.31 m/s

Number of CCF files Total

5

Number of CCF passed QC

5

Number CCF files failed QC

0

First ccf file [Mid exposure]

2020-02-17 10:07:45.623

Last ccf file [Mid exposure]

2020-03-12 07:25:01.738

Last processed [ccf]

2025-02-23 20:12:35.889

Version [ccf]

0.7.292

Request

CCF files

CCF Downloads

File URL

Uploaded

CCF Table

ccf_V_CW_UMA_spirou_offline_udem_file_list.txt

2026-02-12 21:20:05.153

Time series

This section deals with providing the time series information for this object

Debug

This section has various debug plots from APERO products

Telluric map

../../../_images/debug_tcorr_map_plot_V_CW_UMA_spirou_offline_udem.png

Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.

Maximum Saturation level plot

../../../_images/debug_extsmax_plot_V_CW_UMA_spirou_offline_udem.png

Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

../../../_images/debug_effron_plot_V_CW_UMA_spirou_offline_udem.png

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

APERO Processing Debug Plot

../../../_images/debug_version_plot_V_CW_UMA_spirou_offline_udem.png

Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.

APERO Calibration times plot

../../../_images/debug_mjd_cdt_plot_V_CW_UMA_spirou_offline_udem.png

Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.