HR6955 (spirou_offline_udem)

This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 20:47:53.404884 (UTC)

Back to the object table

Contents

Target info

This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=HR6955

Target Information

RA

277.7683926 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Dec

16.92846417 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Finder chart

[FINDER CHART]

Teff

9397.0 [K] (2012A&A…537A.120Z)

Spectral Type

A2V (None)

Proper Motion (RA)

-32.11312994 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Proper Motion (Dec)

-21.38908721 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Parallax

7.988726007 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Radial Velocity

-9.4 [mas/yr] (1953GCRV..C……0W)

Aliases

2MASS J18310444+1655427, AG+16 1838, BD+16 3529, FK5 1481, GC 25284, GCRV 10987, GEN# +1.00170878, GSC 01573-01530, Gaia DR1 4522375987442850816, Gaia DR2 4522375991742826752, HD 170878, HIC 90762, HIP 90762, HR 6955, N30 4111, PMC 90-93 1049, PPM 134827, SAO 103800, SKY# 33865, SRS 31481, TD1 22621, TIC 462871358, TYC 1573-1530-1, UBV 15766, UBV M 23022, WEB 15550, YZ 16 6847, uvby98 100170878, BD+16 3529, HIC 90762, HIP 90762, HR 6955, HR6955, PMC 90-93 1049, SRS 31481, UBV 15766, UBV M 23022, YZ 16 6847, 2MASSJ18310444+1655427, AG+161838, BD+163529, FK51481, GC25284, GCRV10987, GEN#+1.00170878, GSC01573-01530, GaiaDR14522375987442850816, GaiaDR24522375991742826752, HD170878, HIC90762, HIP90762, HR6955, N304111, PMC90-931049, PPM134827, SAO103800, SKY#33865, SRS31481, TD122621, TIC462871358, TYC1573-1530-1, UBV15766, UBVM23022, WEB15550, YZ166847, uvby98100170878, BD+163529, HIC90762, HIP90762, HR6955, HR6955, PMC90-931049, SRS31481, UBV15766, UBVM23022, YZ166847

OBJECT name(s) in headers

HR6955

PI name(s) in headers

Claire Moutou

Project/Run name(s) in headers

18BE96

Spectrum

This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.

LBL

No LBL reduction found

CCF

This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.

../../../_images/ccf_plot_HR6955_spirou_offline_udem.png

CCF stats

Mask used

GL846_neg.fits

CCF systemic velocity

299518.60 \(\pm\) 0.00 m/s

CCF FWHM

1288.27 \(\pm\) 0.00 m/s

Number of CCF files Total

1

Number of CCF passed QC

1

Number CCF files failed QC

0

First ccf file [Mid exposure]

2018-09-23 07:37:51.336

Last ccf file [Mid exposure]

2018-09-23 07:37:51.336

Last processed [ccf]

2025-02-23 21:24:18.085

Version [ccf]

0.7.292

Request

CCF files

CCF Downloads

File URL

Uploaded

CCF Table

ccf_HR6955_spirou_offline_udem_file_list.txt

2026-02-12 20:47:54.854

Time series

This section deals with providing the time series information for this object

Debug

This section has various debug plots from APERO products

Telluric map

../../../_images/debug_tcorr_map_plot_HR6955_spirou_offline_udem.png

Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.

Maximum Saturation level plot

../../../_images/debug_extsmax_plot_HR6955_spirou_offline_udem.png

Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

../../../_images/debug_effron_plot_HR6955_spirou_offline_udem.png

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

APERO Processing Debug Plot

../../../_images/debug_version_plot_HR6955_spirou_offline_udem.png

Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.

APERO Calibration times plot

../../../_images/debug_mjd_cdt_plot_HR6955_spirou_offline_udem.png

Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.