HR6025 (spirou_offline_udem)

This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 20:47:24.569448 (UTC)

Back to the object table

Contents

Target info

This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=HR6025

Target Information

RA

241.581581 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Dec

67.81040729 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Finder chart

[FINDER CHART]

Teff

10900.0 [K] (2016A&A…589A..83G)

Spectral Type

A0Vn (2007A&A…463..671R)

Proper Motion (RA)

-36.09625624 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Proper Motion (Dec)

63.33605529 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Parallax

12.52166836 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Radial Velocity

-18.3 [mas/yr] (2006AstL…32..759G)

Aliases

2MASS J16061971+6748365, AG+67 690, BD+68 864, FK5 3276, GC 21705, GCRV 9286, GEN# +1.00145454, GSC 04419-02888, Gaia DR2 1643563042195991424, HD 145454, HIC 78893, HIP 78893, HR 6025, N30 3620, PLX 3670, PLX 3670.00, PPM 19733, ROT 2289, SAO 16962, SKY# 29071, TD1 18940, TIC 232982544, TYC 4419-2888-1, UBV 13759, WEB 13335, uvby98 100145454, AG+67 690, BD+68 864, GCRV 9286, HIC 78893, HIP 78893, HR 6025, HR6025, PPM 19733, ROT 2289, SAO 16962, UBV 13759, 2MASSJ16061971+6748365, AG+67690, BD+68864, FK53276, GC21705, GCRV9286, GEN#+1.00145454, GSC04419-02888, GaiaDR21643563042195991424, HD145454, HIC78893, HIP78893, HR6025, N303620, PLX3670, PLX3670.00, PPM19733, ROT2289, SAO16962, SKY#29071, TD118940, TIC232982544, TYC4419-2888-1, UBV13759, WEB13335, uvby98100145454, AG+67690, BD+68864, GCRV9286, HIC78893, HIP78893, HR6025, HR6025, PPM19733, ROT2289, SAO16962, UBV13759

OBJECT name(s) in headers

HR6025

PI name(s) in headers

QSO Team

Project/Run name(s) in headers

25BQ58, 25AQ58, 20AQ58, 20BQ58, 21AQ58, 21BQ58, 22AQ58, 23AQ58, 23BQ58, 24AQ58, 24BQ58, 19AQ58, 19BQ58

Spectrum

This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.

LBL

No LBL reduction found

CCF

This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.

../../../_images/ccf_plot_HR6025_spirou_offline_udem.png

CCF stats

Mask used

GL846_neg.fits

CCF systemic velocity

295624.68 \(\pm\) 297527.80 m/s

CCF FWHM

3223.57 \(\pm\) 13228.19 m/s

Number of CCF files Total

62

Number of CCF passed QC

62

Number CCF files failed QC

0

First ccf file [Mid exposure]

2019-02-18 15:40:52.859

Last ccf file [Mid exposure]

2025-10-14 05:07:24.016

Last processed [ccf]

2025-11-04 18:06:27.906

Version [ccf]

0.7.294,0.7.292,0.7.293

Request

CCF files

CCF Downloads

File URL

Uploaded

CCF Table

ccf_HR6025_spirou_offline_udem_file_list.txt

2026-02-12 20:47:35.374

Time series

This section deals with providing the time series information for this object

Debug

This section has various debug plots from APERO products

Telluric map

../../../_images/debug_tcorr_map_plot_HR6025_spirou_offline_udem.png

Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.

Maximum Saturation level plot

../../../_images/debug_extsmax_plot_HR6025_spirou_offline_udem.png

Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

../../../_images/debug_effron_plot_HR6025_spirou_offline_udem.png

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

APERO Processing Debug Plot

../../../_images/debug_version_plot_HR6025_spirou_offline_udem.png

Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.

APERO Calibration times plot

../../../_images/debug_mjd_cdt_plot_HR6025_spirou_offline_udem.png

Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.