HD115404 (spirou_offline_udem)¶
This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 20:40:02.813322 (UTC)
Back to the object table
Contents¶
Target info¶
This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=HD115404
Target Information |
|
|---|---|
RA |
199.2156717 [deg] (Gaia EDR3) |
Dec |
17.0160017 [deg] (Gaia EDR3) |
Finder chart |
|
Teff |
5030.0 [K] (2021AJ….161..134H) |
Spectral Type |
K2V (2007AJ….133.2524W) |
Proper Motion (RA) |
636.2847352 [mas/yr] (Gaia EDR3) |
Proper Motion (Dec) |
-264.678285 [mas/yr] (Gaia EDR3) |
Parallax |
91.01762241 [mas/yr] (Gaia EDR3) |
Radial Velocity |
7.781 [mas/yr] (2018A&A…616A…7S) |
Aliases |
LHS 2713, ** BU 800A, ADS 8841 A, AG+17 1357, AKARI-IRC-V1 J1316514+170059, ASCC 868574, BD+17 2611, CCDM J13169+1701A, Ci 20 767, CSI+17 2611 1, CSI+17 2611 4, 1ES 1314+17.2, GC 17981, GCRV 7895, GEN# +1.00115404, G 63-18, G 149-71, GJ 505 A, HD 115404, HIC 64797, HIP 64797, IDS 13118+1733 A, IRAS 13143+1716, LFT 988, LSPM J1316+1701W, LTT 13853, 2MASS J13165106+1701021, NLTT 33527, PLX 3035, PM 13144+1717, PPM 129708, SAO 100491, SKY# 24538, SPOCS 2856, TIC 373765355, TYC 1451-1151-1, UBV 12007, UBV M 19228, uvby98 100115404, WDS J13169+1701A, WEB 11452, WISEA J131651.68+170058.2, YZC 18 4874, YZ 17 4874, [RHG95] 2085, [ZEH2003] RX J1316.8+1700 1, Gaia EDR3 3936909723803146368, Gaia DR2 3936909723803146368, LHS2713, **BU800A, ADS8841A, AG+171357, AKARI-IRC-V1J1316514+170059, ASCC868574, BD+172611, CCDMJ13169+1701A, Ci20767, CSI+1726111, CSI+1726114, 1ES1314+17.2, GC17981, GCRV7895, GEN#+1.00115404, G63-18, G149-71, GJ505A, HD115404, HIC64797, HIP64797, IDS13118+1733A, IRAS13143+1716, LFT988, LSPMJ1316+1701W, LTT13853, 2MASSJ13165106+1701021, NLTT33527, PLX3035, PM13144+1717, PPM129708, SAO100491, SKY#24538, SPOCS2856, TIC373765355, TYC1451-1151-1, UBV12007, UBVM19228, uvby98100115404, WDSJ13169+1701A, WEB11452, WISEAJ131651.68+170058.2, YZC184874, YZ174874, [RHG95]2085, [ZEH2003]RXJ1316.8+17001, GaiaEDR33936909723803146368, GaiaDR23936909723803146368 |
OBJECT name(s) in headers |
HD 115404 |
PI name(s) in headers |
Ryan Cloutier |
Project/Run name(s) in headers |
21AC33 |
Spectrum¶
This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.
LBL¶
No LBL reduction found
CCF¶
This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.
CCF stats |
|
|---|---|
Mask used |
GL846_neg.fits |
CCF systemic velocity |
8267.37 \(\pm\) 0.00 m/s |
CCF FWHM |
8916.15 \(\pm\) 0.00 m/s |
Number of CCF files Total |
1 |
Number of CCF passed QC |
1 |
Number CCF files failed QC |
0 |
First ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2021-03-04 16:07:29.696 |
Last ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2021-03-04 16:07:29.696 |
Last processed [ccf] |
2025-02-23 18:31:28.749 |
Version [ccf] |
0.7.292 |
Request |
|---|
CCF Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
|---|---|---|
CCF Table |
2026-02-12 20:40:04.240 |
Time series¶
This section deals with providing the time series information for this object
Debug¶
This section has various debug plots from APERO products
Telluric map¶
Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.
Maximum Saturation level plot¶
Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction
Measured effective readout noise before extraction¶
Measured effective readout noise before extraction
APERO Processing Debug Plot¶
Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.
APERO Calibration times plot¶
Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.