GL480 (spirou_offline_udem)¶
This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 20:15:28.730261 (UTC)
Back to the object table
Contents¶
Target info¶
This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=GL480
Target Information |
|
|---|---|
RA |
189.7132587 [deg] (Gaia EDR3) |
Dec |
11.69503595 [deg] (Gaia EDR3) |
Finder chart |
|
Teff |
3509.0 [K] (2022MNRAS.516.3802C) |
Spectral Type |
M3.5Ve (2013AJ….145..102L) |
Proper Motion (RA) |
-1155.756421 [mas/yr] (Gaia EDR3) |
Proper Motion (Dec) |
-250.8624365 [mas/yr] (Gaia EDR3) |
Parallax |
70.11389785 [mas/yr] (Gaia EDR3) |
Radial Velocity |
-4.19 [mas/yr] (2018MNRAS.475.1960F) |
Aliases |
2MASS J12385241+1141461, ASCC 954292, CSI+11-12364, Ci 20 726, G 60-24, G 61-5, GALEX 3085073634393327396, GCRV 7601, GEN# +9.80060024, GJ 480, Gaia DR2 3928391218812375808, Gaia EDR3 3928391218812375808, HIC 61706, HIP 61706, LFT 933, LHS 338, LSPM J1238+1141, LTT 13588, NLTT 31394, PLX 2915, PLX 2915.00, PM 12364+1158, PM J12388+1141, TIC 399119319, TYC 878-1104-1, UCAC4 509-053260, USNO-B1.0 1016-00213233, WEB 10979, WISEA J123851.61+114143.5, Wolf 433, Zkh 185, [RHG95] 1988, ASCC 954292, Ci 20 726, G 60-24, G 61-5, GCRV 7601, GJ 480, GL480, Gl480, HIC 61706, HIP 61706, LFT 933, LHS 338, TYC 878-1104-1, Wolf 433, [RHG95] 1988, 2MASSJ12385241+1141461, ASCC954292, CSI+11-12364, Ci20726, G60-24, G61-5, GALEX3085073634393327396, GCRV7601, GEN#+9.80060024, GJ480, GaiaDR23928391218812375808, GaiaEDR33928391218812375808, HIC61706, HIP61706, LFT933, LHS338, LSPMJ1238+1141, LTT13588, NLTT31394, PLX2915, PLX2915.00, PM12364+1158, PMJ12388+1141, TIC399119319, TYC878-1104-1, UCAC4509-053260, USNO-B1.01016-00213233, WEB10979, WISEAJ123851.61+114143.5, Wolf433, Zkh185, [RHG95]1988, ASCC954292, Ci20726, G60-24, G61-5, GCRV7601, GJ480, GL480, Gl480, HIC61706, HIP61706, LFT933, LHS338, TYC878-1104-1, Wolf433, [RHG95]1988 |
OBJECT name(s) in headers |
Gl480 |
PI name(s) in headers |
Etienne Artigau, Andres Carmona, Jean-Francois Donati |
Project/Run name(s) in headers |
25BC08, 25AF23, 24BC05, 24BF13, 20AP40, 20BP40, 21AP40, 19BP40, 22AP40, 23AD98, 23BF12, 24AC25, 24AF17 |
Spectrum¶
This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.
LBL¶
No LBL reduction found
CCF¶
This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.
CCF stats |
|
|---|---|
Mask used |
GL846_neg.fits |
CCF systemic velocity |
-4244.54 \(\pm\) 13.72 m/s |
CCF FWHM |
6834.59 \(\pm\) 88.38 m/s |
Number of CCF files Total |
616 |
Number of CCF passed QC |
616 |
Number CCF files failed QC |
0 |
First ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2019-11-13 15:48:03.950 |
Last ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2025-11-30 15:51:16.347 |
Last processed [ccf] |
2026-01-07 12:11:01.451 |
Version [ccf] |
0.7.292,0.7.295,0.7.293 |
Request |
|---|
CCF Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
|---|---|---|
CCF Table |
2026-02-12 20:16:40.043 |
Time series¶
This section deals with providing the time series information for this object
Debug¶
This section has various debug plots from APERO products
Telluric map¶
Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.
Maximum Saturation level plot¶
Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction
Measured effective readout noise before extraction¶
Measured effective readout noise before extraction
APERO Processing Debug Plot¶
Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.
APERO Calibration times plot¶
Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.