CDM35_2722 (spirou_offline_udem)

This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 19:40:48.251560 (UTC)

Back to the object table

Contents

Target info

This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=CDM35_2722

Target Information

RA

92.33001466 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Dec

-35.82553753 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Finder chart

[FINDER CHART]

Teff

3700.0 [K] (HEADER[OBS_DIR=2024-12-04])

Spectral Type

M1Ve (2006A&A…460..695T)

Proper Motion (RA)

-3.72339019 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Proper Motion (Dec)

-56.27311893 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Parallax

44.63457478 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Radial Velocity

31.835 [mas/yr] (2021A&A…645A..30Z)

Aliases

CD-35 2722, ** WHH 1, ASAS J060919-3549.5, ASAS J060919-3549.3, CNS5 1524, DENIS J060919.2-354931, EUVE J0609-35.8, GSC 07084-00794, 2MASS J06091922-3549311, PM J06093-3549, RE J060918-354929, 1RXS J060919.3-354926, 1SWASP J060919.21-354931.1, TIC 201426753, TYC 7084-794-1, UCAC2 16527559, UCAC3 109-20079, UCAC4 271-008862, USNO-B1.0 0541-00059147, WDS J06093-3550AB,C, [CCD97] EUVE J0609-358 1, Gaia DR3 2885863400349980288, Gaia DR2 2885863400349980288, Gaia DR1 2885863396053210496, CD-352722, **WHH1, ASASJ060919-3549.5, ASASJ060919-3549.3, CNS51524, DENISJ060919.2-354931, EUVEJ0609-35.8, GSC07084-00794, 2MASSJ06091922-3549311, PMJ06093-3549, REJ060918-354929, 1RXSJ060919.3-354926, 1SWASPJ060919.21-354931.1, TIC201426753, TYC7084-794-1, UCAC216527559, UCAC3109-20079, UCAC4271-008862, USNO-B1.00541-00059147, WDSJ06093-3550AB,C, [CCD97]EUVEJ0609-3581, GaiaDR32885863400349980288, GaiaDR22885863400349980288, GaiaDR12885863396053210496

OBJECT name(s) in headers

CD-35 2722

PI name(s) in headers

Julien Morin

Project/Run name(s) in headers

24BF30

Spectrum

This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.

LBL

No LBL reduction found

CCF

This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.

../../../_images/ccf_plot_CDM35_2722_spirou_offline_udem.png

CCF stats

Mask used

GL846_neg.fits

CCF systemic velocity

32543.40 \(\pm\) 73.23 m/s

CCF FWHM

19982.03 \(\pm\) 412.28 m/s

Number of CCF files Total

52

Number of CCF passed QC

52

Number CCF files failed QC

0

First ccf file [Mid exposure]

2024-12-04 12:00:32.800

Last ccf file [Mid exposure]

2024-12-23 09:02:03.838

Last processed [ccf]

2025-02-23 14:04:10.802

Version [ccf]

0.7.292

Request

CCF files

CCF Downloads

File URL

Uploaded

CCF Table

ccf_CDM35_2722_spirou_offline_udem_file_list.txt

2026-02-12 19:40:59.067

Time series

This section deals with providing the time series information for this object

Debug

This section has various debug plots from APERO products

Telluric map

../../../_images/debug_tcorr_map_plot_CDM35_2722_spirou_offline_udem.png

Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.

Maximum Saturation level plot

../../../_images/debug_extsmax_plot_CDM35_2722_spirou_offline_udem.png

Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

../../../_images/debug_effron_plot_CDM35_2722_spirou_offline_udem.png

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

APERO Processing Debug Plot

../../../_images/debug_version_plot_CDM35_2722_spirou_offline_udem.png

Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.

APERO Calibration times plot

../../../_images/debug_mjd_cdt_plot_CDM35_2722_spirou_offline_udem.png

Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.