BPTAU (spirou_offline_udem)¶
This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 19:24:29.926408 (UTC)
Back to the object table
Contents¶
Target info¶
This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=BPTAU
Target Information |
|
|---|---|
RA |
64.81601875 [deg] (Gaia DR2) |
Dec |
29.1073677 [deg] (Gaia DR2) |
Finder chart |
|
Teff |
3848.0 [K] (2020AJ….160..120J) |
Spectral Type |
K5/7Ve (1977ApJ…214..747H) |
Proper Motion (RA) |
8.627386559 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2) |
Proper Motion (Dec) |
-26.17676792 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2) |
Parallax |
7.747447566 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2) |
Radial Velocity |
15.76 [mas/yr] (2019AJ….157..196K) |
Aliases |
1RXS J041915.3+290632, 2E 971, 2E 0416.1+2859, 2MASS J04191583+2906269, AAVSO 0413+28, AKARI-IRC-V1 J0419158+290626, CSI+28-04162, GBS-VLA J041915.84+290626.6, GCRV 54933, GSC 01827-00554, Gaia DR1 164832735923325440, Gaia DR2 164832740220756608, HBC 32, HD 281934, HIC 20160, HIP 20160, IRAS 04161+2859, JP11 3788, MHA 259-7, PDS 6, SSTtau 041915.8+290626, SV* P 2619, SV* SVS 691, TIC 58287935, TYC 1827-554-1, UCAC2 42014678, UCAC4 596-012169, V* BP Tau, WISE J041915.83+290626.6, WISE J041915.83+290626.7, XEST 28-100, XEST 28-OM-014, [ABG2007] 342, [GBA2007] 570, 2E 971, BPTAU, BPTau, HBC 32, HIC 20160, HIP 20160, JP11 3788, PDS 6, SV* P 2619, SV* SVS 691, UCAC2 42014678, 1RXSJ041915.3+290632, 2E971, 2E0416.1+2859, 2MASSJ04191583+2906269, AAVSO0413+28, AKARI-IRC-V1J0419158+290626, CSI+28-04162, GBS-VLAJ041915.84+290626.6, GCRV54933, GSC01827-00554, GaiaDR1164832735923325440, GaiaDR2164832740220756608, HBC32, HD281934, HIC20160, HIP20160, IRAS04161+2859, JP113788, MHA259-7, PDS6, SSTtau041915.8+290626, SV*P2619, SV*SVS691, TIC58287935, TYC1827-554-1, UCAC242014678, UCAC4596-012169, V*BPTau, WISEJ041915.83+290626.6, WISEJ041915.83+290626.7, XEST28-100, XEST28-OM-014, [ABG2007]342, [GBA2007]570, 2E971, BPTAU, BPTau, HBC32, HIC20160, HIP20160, JP113788, PDS6, SV*P2619, SV*SVS691, UCAC242014678 |
OBJECT name(s) in headers |
BPTau |
PI name(s) in headers |
Jean-Francois Donati |
Project/Run name(s) in headers |
21BP40, 22BP45, 23BP45, 19BP40 |
Spectrum¶
This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.
LBL¶
No LBL reduction found
CCF¶
This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.
CCF stats |
|
|---|---|
Mask used |
GL846_neg.fits |
CCF systemic velocity |
15980.82 \(\pm\) 185.25 m/s |
CCF FWHM |
13768.31 \(\pm\) 449.61 m/s |
Number of CCF files Total |
283 |
Number of CCF passed QC |
283 |
Number CCF files failed QC |
0 |
First ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2019-10-02 14:45:10.791 |
Last ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2023-12-26 11:16:04.763 |
Last processed [ccf] |
2025-02-23 20:46:27.492 |
Version [ccf] |
0.7.292 |
Request |
|---|
CCF Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
|---|---|---|
CCF Table |
2026-02-12 19:25:03.468 |
Time series¶
This section deals with providing the time series information for this object
Debug¶
This section has various debug plots from APERO products
Telluric map¶
Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.
Maximum Saturation level plot¶
Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction
Measured effective readout noise before extraction¶
Measured effective readout noise before extraction
APERO Processing Debug Plot¶
Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.
APERO Calibration times plot¶
Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.