17PEG (spirou_offline_udem)

This page was last modified: 2026-02-12 19:19:55.320545 (UTC)

Back to the object table

Contents

Target info

This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=17PEG

Target Information

RA

329.2347615 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Dec

12.07643382 [deg] (Gaia DR2)

Finder chart

[FINDER CHART]

Teff

9247.0 [K] (2012A&A…537A.120Z)

Spectral Type

A2Vnn (None)

Proper Motion (RA)

-27.50976278 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Proper Motion (Dec)

-12.81550065 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Parallax

7.583223795 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2)

Radial Velocity

10.3 [mas/yr] (2006AstL…32..759G)

Aliases

* 17 Peg, 2MASS J21565637+1204354, AG+11 2735, BD+11 4696, FK5 3751, GC 30719, GCRV 13788, GEN# +1.00208565, GSC 01130-01972, Gaia DR2 2728431923869085056, HD 208565, HIC 108339, HIP 108339, HR 8373, N30 4836, PPM 140856, ROT 3192, SAO 107528, SKY# 41820, TD1 28611, TIC 60595351, TYC 1130-1972-1, UBV 18771, UBV M 26010, WEB 19513, YZ 11 8738, uvby98 100208565, * 17 Peg, 17PEG, 17Peg, BD+11 4696, HR 8373, ROT 3192, UBV 18771, UBV M 26010, YZ 11 8738, *17Peg, 2MASSJ21565637+1204354, AG+112735, BD+114696, FK53751, GC30719, GCRV13788, GEN#+1.00208565, GSC01130-01972, GaiaDR22728431923869085056, HD208565, HIC108339, HIP108339, HR8373, N304836, PPM140856, ROT3192, SAO107528, SKY#41820, TD128611, TIC60595351, TYC1130-1972-1, UBV18771, UBVM26010, WEB19513, YZ118738, uvby98100208565, *17Peg, 17PEG, 17Peg, BD+114696, HR8373, ROT3192, UBV18771, UBVM26010, YZ118738

OBJECT name(s) in headers

17Peg

PI name(s) in headers

QSO Team, Claire Moutou

Project/Run name(s) in headers

25BQ58, 25AQ58, 20BQ58, 21AQ58, 21BQ58, 22AQ58, 22BQ58, 23AQ58, 23BQ58, 24AQ58, 24BQ58, 18BE93, 19AQ58, 19BQ58, 20AQ58

Spectrum

This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.

LBL

No LBL reduction found

CCF

This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.

../../../_images/ccf_plot_17PEG_spirou_offline_udem.png

CCF stats

Mask used

GL846_neg.fits

CCF systemic velocity

298554.53 \(\pm\) 3829.85 m/s

CCF FWHM

11423.96 \(\pm\) 77295.61 m/s

Number of CCF files Total

87

Number of CCF passed QC

87

Number CCF files failed QC

0

First ccf file [Mid exposure]

2018-09-25 11:38:54.331

Last ccf file [Mid exposure]

2025-11-29 04:49:18.519

Last processed [ccf]

2026-01-07 12:20:33.731

Version [ccf]

0.7.294,0.7.292,0.7.295,0.7.293

Request

CCF files

CCF Downloads

File URL

Uploaded

CCF Table

ccf_17PEG_spirou_offline_udem_file_list.txt

2026-02-12 19:20:13.554

Time series

This section deals with providing the time series information for this object

Debug

This section has various debug plots from APERO products

Telluric map

../../../_images/debug_tcorr_map_plot_17PEG_spirou_offline_udem.png

Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.

Maximum Saturation level plot

../../../_images/debug_extsmax_plot_17PEG_spirou_offline_udem.png

Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

../../../_images/debug_effron_plot_17PEG_spirou_offline_udem.png

Measured effective readout noise before extraction

APERO Processing Debug Plot

../../../_images/debug_version_plot_17PEG_spirou_offline_udem.png

Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.

APERO Calibration times plot

../../../_images/debug_mjd_cdt_plot_17PEG_spirou_offline_udem.png

Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.