HLTAU (spirou_offline_udem)¶
This page was last modified: 2025-01-17 00:14:18.333419 (UTC)
Back to the object table
Contents¶
Target info¶
This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=HLTAU
Target Information |
|
---|---|
RA |
67.91029972 [deg] (UCAC4) |
Dec |
18.23280139 [deg] (UCAC4) |
Finder chart |
|
Teff |
4450.0 [K] (HEADER[CFHT]) |
Spectral Type |
K5 (2004ApJ…616..998W) |
Proper Motion (RA) |
4.199999809 [mas/yr] (UCAC4) |
Proper Motion (Dec) |
-15.30000019 [mas/yr] (UCAC4) |
Parallax |
0.0 [mas/yr] (UCAC4) |
Radial Velocity |
nan [mas/yr] (None) |
Aliases |
** HER 10B, 2MASS J04313843+1813576, 2XMM J043138.4+181357, AAVSO 0425+18B, AKARI-IRC-V1 J0431384+181357, EPIC 210690913, GBS-VLA J043138.42+181357.3, GSC 01269-01065, HBC 49, HH 150, Haro 6-14, JCMTSE J043138.3+181356, JCMTSF J043138.3+181356, JP11 5275, SDSS J043138.46+181357.8, SSV LDN 1551 1, TIC 353752575, UCAC2 38202581, UCAC4 542-009387, V* HL Tau, WDS J04317+1814B, WISE J043138.43+181357.5, WISEA J043138.48+181357.6, XEST 22-043, [BFR2003] 35, [FGM2003] 29, [FGM2003] S19, [FK83] LDN 1551 11, [GBA2007] 1319, [GMM2009] Tau L1551 2, ** HER 10B, HBC 49, HH 150, HLTAU, HLTau, JP11 5275, SSV LDN 1551 1, UCAC2 38202581, [GMM2009] Tau L1551 2, hl tau, **HER10B, 2MASSJ04313843+1813576, 2XMMJ043138.4+181357, AAVSO0425+18B, AKARI-IRC-V1J0431384+181357, EPIC210690913, GBS-VLAJ043138.42+181357.3, GSC01269-01065, HBC49, HH150, Haro6-14, JCMTSEJ043138.3+181356, JCMTSFJ043138.3+181356, JP115275, SDSSJ043138.46+181357.8, SSVLDN15511, TIC353752575, UCAC238202581, UCAC4542-009387, V*HLTau, WDSJ04317+1814B, WISEJ043138.43+181357.5, WISEAJ043138.48+181357.6, XEST22-043, [BFR2003]35, [FGM2003]29, [FGM2003]S19, [FK83]LDN155111, [GBA2007]1319, [GMM2009]TauL15512, **HER10B, HBC49, HH150, HLTAU, HLTau, JP115275, SSVLDN15511, UCAC238202581, [GMM2009]TauL15512, hltau |
OBJECT name(s) in headers |
HLTau |
Spectrum¶
This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.
Spectrum Information |
|
---|---|
DPRTYPES |
POLAR_FP |
Total number raw files |
30 |
First raw files |
2018-09-22 14:18:18.854 |
Last raw files |
2020-09-22 13:28:36.168 |
Total number PP files |
30 |
Number PP files passed QC |
30 |
Number PP files failed QC |
0 |
First pp file [Mid exposure] |
2018-09-22 14:18:18.854 |
Last pp file [Mid exposure] |
2020-09-22 13:28:36.168 |
Last processed [pp] |
2024-12-19 10:35:22.209 |
Version [pp] |
0.7.292 |
Total number ext files |
30 |
Number ext files passed QC |
30 |
Number ext files failed QC |
0 |
First ext file [Mid exposure] |
2018-09-22 14:18:18.854 |
Last ext file [Mid exposure] |
2020-09-22 13:28:36.168 |
Last processed [ext] |
2024-12-17 10:43:56.503 |
Version [ext] |
0.7.292 |
Total number tcorr files |
30 |
Number tcorr files passed QC |
28 |
Number tcorr files failed QC |
2 |
First tcorr file [Mid exposure] |
2018-09-22 14:18:18.854 |
Last tcorr file [Mid exposure] |
2020-09-22 13:28:36.168 |
Last processed [tcorr] |
2024-12-22 20:50:42.122 |
Version [tcorr] |
0.7.292 |
Median SNR Y |
8.44 \(\pm\) 2.59 |
Median SNR H |
70.71 \(\pm\) 15.18 |
Request |
---|
Spectrum Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
---|---|---|
Extracted 2D spectra |
2025-01-17 00:14:29.912 |
|
Extracted 1D spectra |
2025-01-17 00:14:29.912 |
|
Telluric corrected 2D spectra |
2025-01-17 00:14:29.912 |
|
Telluric corrected 1D spectra |
2025-01-17 00:14:29.912 |
|
Extracted 2D header file |
2025-01-17 00:14:29.911 |
LBL (HLTAU_HLTAU)¶
This section presents the LBL results for HLTAU_HLTAU. The first object is the target we measure RVs for the second is the “friend” or “template” that was used to calculate those RVs.
LBL stats |
|
---|---|
RV Uncertainty lbl.rdb (25, 50, 75 percentile) |
15.87, 20.87, 22.37 m/s |
RV Absolute Deviation lbl.rdb (25, 50, 75 percentile) |
53.87, 95.01, 161.30 m/s |
Number of lbl.rdb Measurements |
24 |
Number of lbl.rdb Spurious Low Points |
0 |
Number of lbl.rdb Spurious High Points |
0 |
Number of Nights |
7 |
Number of Reset RV Points |
0 |
Systemic Velocity |
19047.84 m/s |
Velocity Domain considered valid |
18319.09 to 20036.15 m/s |
LBL Version |
0.65.002 |
Request |
---|
LBL Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
---|---|---|
RDB file |
2025-01-03 15:28:10.747 |
|
RDB2 file |
2025-01-03 15:28:11.440 |
|
Drift file |
2025-01-03 15:28:14.643 |
|
Drift2 file |
2025-01-03 15:28:14.735 |
LBL (HLTAU_GL846)¶
This section presents the LBL results for HLTAU_GL846. The first object is the target we measure RVs for the second is the “friend” or “template” that was used to calculate those RVs.
N/A
CCF¶
This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.
CCF stats |
|
---|---|
Mask used |
GL846_neg.fits |
CCF systemic velocity |
276420.85 \(\pm\) 15759.62 m/s |
CCF FWHM |
4256.94 \(\pm\) 2613.94 m/s |
Number of CCF files Total |
28 |
Number of CCF passed QC |
28 |
Number CCF files failed QC |
0 |
First ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2018-09-22 14:18:18.854 |
Last ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2020-09-22 13:28:36.168 |
Last processed [ccf] |
2024-12-23 18:21:16.166 |
Version [ccf] |
0.7.292 |
Request |
---|
CCF Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
---|---|---|
CCF Table |
2025-01-17 00:14:35.031 |
Time series¶
This section deals with providing the time series information for this object
Obs Dir |
First obs mid |
Last obs mid |
Number of ext |
Number of tcorr |
Seeing |
Airmass |
Mean Exptime |
Total Exptime |
SNR[Order 8 (#71 1.08um)] |
SNR[Order 35 (#44 1.75um)] |
DPRTYPEs |
ext_files |
tcorr_files |
Request ext files |
Request tcorr files |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-09-22 |
2018-09-22 14:18:18.854 |
2018-09-22 14:50:16.545 |
4 |
4 |
0.502 |
1.005 |
601.767 |
2407.068 |
7.681 |
65.285 |
POLAR_FP |
||||
2018-09-23 |
2018-09-23 13:56:32.737 |
2018-09-23 14:28:19.196 |
4 |
4 |
0.347 |
1.014 |
601.767 |
2407.068 |
8.682 |
60.069 |
POLAR_FP |
||||
2018-09-25 |
2018-09-25 13:31:18.136 |
2018-09-25 14:03:03.645 |
4 |
4 |
0.620 |
1.029 |
601.767 |
2407.068 |
7.823 |
51.884 |
POLAR_FP |
||||
2019-01-16 |
2019-01-16 06:50:14.829 |
2019-01-16 07:22:12.062 |
4 |
2 |
0.508 |
1.003 |
601.767 |
2407.068 |
7.609 |
69.299 |
POLAR_FP |
||||
2019-01-17 |
2019-01-17 06:32:34.701 |
2019-01-17 07:04:37.844 |
4 |
4 |
0.403 |
1.007 |
601.767 |
2407.068 |
9.151 |
71.406 |
POLAR_FP |
||||
2019-01-18 |
2019-01-18 07:09:04.120 |
2019-01-18 07:16:07.687 |
2 |
2 |
-9999.900 |
1.000 |
384.463 |
768.925 |
4.351 |
51.041 |
POLAR_FP |
||||
2020-09-18 |
2020-09-18 13:34:02.778 |
2020-09-18 14:20:23.838 |
4 |
4 |
-9999.900 |
1.051 |
902.651 |
3610.604 |
11.926 |
81.038 |
POLAR_FP |
||||
2020-09-22 |
2020-09-22 12:42:15.160 |
2020-09-22 13:28:36.168 |
4 |
4 |
0.600 |
1.117 |
902.651 |
3610.604 |
14.420 |
99.780 |
POLAR_FP |
Debug¶
This section has various debug plots from APERO products
Telluric map¶
Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.
Shape QC plot¶
Shape parameters varying in time.dx is a shift along the order, dy is a shift across orders, [[A,B],[C,D]] is an affine transformation matrix.
wfpdrift plot¶
Wavelength solution absolute CCF FP Drift [km/s]
Wave cavity (c0) plot¶
Wave cavity polynomial coeffs=0
Maximum Saturation level plot¶
Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction
Measured effective readout noise before extraction¶
Measured effective readout noise before extraction
APERO Processing Debug Plot¶
Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.
APERO Calibration times plot¶
Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.