HD136352 (nirps_he_offline_udem)¶
This page was last modified: 2025-01-01 18:26:11.372879 (UTC)
Back to the object table
Contents¶
Target info¶
This section gives some details of the APERO astrometric database used when processing this target (e.g. for BERV calculation). Any observation with a object name in the alias list will be associated with this “APERO target” i.e. DRSOBJN=HD136352
Target Information |
|
|---|---|
RA |
230.4401147 [deg] (Gaia DR2) |
Dec |
-48.31881738 [deg] (Gaia DR2) |
Finder chart |
|
Teff |
5615.0 [K] (2021MNRAS.506..150B) |
Spectral Type |
G3/5V (1978MSS…C02….0H) |
Proper Motion (RA) |
-1624.046813 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2) |
Proper Motion (Dec) |
-276.0236579 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2) |
Parallax |
68.08177391 [mas/yr] (Gaia DR2) |
Radial Velocity |
-68.78 [mas/yr] (2018A&A…616A…7S) |
Aliases |
LHS 395, * nu.02 Lup, AKARI-IRC-V1 J1521470-481904, CD-47 9919, Ci 20 926, CPC 0 13244, CPD-47 7075, GC 20635, GCRV 8877, GEN# +1.00136352, GJ 582, GSC 08298-01229, HD 136352, HIC 75181, HIP 75181, HR 5699, IRAS 15183-4808, LFT 1200, LPM 565, LTT 6125, 2MASS J15214824-4819032, NLTT 39962, PLX 3462, PLX 3462.00, PM 15184-4808, PPM 320504, RAVE J152148.2-481904, SAO 225697, SKY# 27821, SPOCS 650, TD1 18144, TIC 136916387, TYC 8298-1229-1, UBV 13204, UBV M 20703, uvby98 100136352, WEB 12827, WISEA J152146.46-481906.0, WISE J152146.49-481906.1, Gaia DR3 5902750168276592256, Gaia DR2 5902750168276592256, Gaia DR1 5902750163955467392, NU_02_LUP, HD_136352, HD-136352, LHS395, *nu.02Lup, AKARI-IRC-V1J1521470-481904, CD-479919, Ci20926, CPC013244, CPD-477075, GC20635, GCRV8877, GEN#+1.00136352, GJ582, GSC08298-01229, HD136352, HIC75181, HIP75181, HR5699, IRAS15183-4808, LFT1200, LPM565, LTT6125, 2MASSJ15214824-4819032, NLTT39962, PLX3462, PLX3462.00, PM15184-4808, PPM320504, RAVEJ152148.2-481904, SAO225697, SKY#27821, SPOCS650, TD118144, TIC136916387, TYC8298-1229-1, UBV13204, UBVM20703, uvby98100136352, WEB12827, WISEAJ152146.46-481906.0, WISEJ152146.49-481906.1, GaiaDR35902750168276592256, GaiaDR25902750168276592256, GaiaDR15902750163955467392, NU02LUP, HD136352, HD-136352 |
OBJECT name(s) in headers |
HD136352 |
Spectrum¶
This section presents the observation after extraction,with and without telluric correction.
Spectrum Information |
|
|---|---|
DPRTYPES |
OBJ_SKY |
Total number raw files |
220 |
First raw files |
2023-05-21 01:41:25.754 |
Last raw files |
2024-07-08 04:19:03.786 |
Total number PP files |
220 |
Number PP files passed QC |
220 |
Number PP files failed QC |
0 |
First pp file [Mid exposure] |
2023-05-21 01:41:25.754 |
Last pp file [Mid exposure] |
2024-07-08 04:19:03.786 |
Last processed [pp] |
2024-12-25 23:57:31.029 |
Version [pp] |
0.7.292 |
Total number ext files |
220 |
Number ext files passed QC |
220 |
Number ext files failed QC |
0 |
First ext file [Mid exposure] |
2023-05-21 01:41:25.754 |
Last ext file [Mid exposure] |
2024-07-08 04:19:03.786 |
Last processed [ext] |
2024-12-19 02:25:48.224 |
Version [ext] |
0.7.292 |
Total number tcorr files |
220 |
Number tcorr files passed QC |
219 |
Number tcorr files failed QC |
1 |
First tcorr file [Mid exposure] |
2023-05-21 01:41:25.754 |
Last tcorr file [Mid exposure] |
2024-07-08 04:19:03.786 |
Last processed [tcorr] |
2024-12-29 19:04:06.126 |
Version [tcorr] |
0.7.292 |
Median SNR Y |
234.09 \(\pm\) 38.24 |
Median SNR H |
293.34 \(\pm\) 54.48 |
Request |
|---|
Spectrum Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
|---|---|---|
Extracted 2D spectra |
2025-01-01 18:26:25.882 |
|
Extracted 1D spectra |
2025-01-01 18:26:25.883 |
|
Telluric corrected 2D spectra |
2025-01-01 18:26:25.885 |
|
Telluric corrected 1D spectra |
2025-01-01 18:26:25.886 |
|
Extracted 2D header file |
2025-01-01 18:26:25.878 |
LBL (HD136352_HD136352)¶
This section presents the LBL results for HD136352_HD136352. The first object is the target we measure RVs for the second is the “friend” or “template” that was used to calculate those RVs.
LBL stats |
|
|---|---|
RV Uncertainty lbl.rdb (25, 50, 75 percentile) |
2.38, 2.51, 2.79 m/s |
RV Absolute Deviation lbl.rdb (25, 50, 75 percentile) |
3.15, 8.08, 15.60 m/s |
Number of lbl.rdb Measurements |
220 |
Number of lbl.rdb Spurious Low Points |
0 |
Number of lbl.rdb Spurious High Points |
0 |
Number of Nights |
2 |
Number of Reset RV Points |
0 |
Systemic Velocity |
-68398.25 m/s |
Velocity Domain considered valid |
-68445.22 to -68345.36 m/s |
LBL Version |
0.65.002 |
Request |
|---|
LBL Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
|---|---|---|
RDB file |
2025-01-01 01:45:00.491 |
|
RDB2 file |
2025-01-01 01:45:07.767 |
|
Drift file |
2025-01-01 01:45:07.882 |
|
Drift2 file |
2025-01-01 01:45:07.924 |
LBL (HD136352_HD85512)¶
This section presents the LBL results for HD136352_HD85512. The first object is the target we measure RVs for the second is the “friend” or “template” that was used to calculate those RVs.
LBL stats |
|
|---|---|
RV Uncertainty lbl.rdb (25, 50, 75 percentile) |
5.81, 6.24, 6.34 m/s |
RV Absolute Deviation lbl.rdb (25, 50, 75 percentile) |
2.94, 8.05, 12.41 m/s |
Number of lbl.rdb Measurements |
220 |
Number of lbl.rdb Spurious Low Points |
0 |
Number of lbl.rdb Spurious High Points |
1 |
Number of Nights |
2 |
Number of Reset RV Points |
0 |
Systemic Velocity |
-68231.96 m/s |
Velocity Domain considered valid |
-68272.52 to -68192.69 m/s |
LBL Version |
0.65.002 |
Request |
|---|
LBL Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
|---|---|---|
RDB file |
2025-01-01 01:47:29.739 |
|
RDB2 file |
2025-01-01 01:47:33.575 |
|
Drift file |
2025-01-01 01:47:33.690 |
|
Drift2 file |
2025-01-01 01:47:33.726 |
CCF¶
This section presents the APERO CCF results for this object.
CCF stats |
|
|---|---|
Mask used |
GJ9425_neg.fits |
CCF systemic velocity |
-68222.55 \(\pm\) 24.13 m/s |
CCF FWHM |
6682.92 \(\pm\) 53.07 m/s |
Number of CCF files Total |
220 |
Number of CCF passed QC |
220 |
Number CCF files failed QC |
0 |
First ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2023-05-21 01:41:25.754 |
Last ccf file [Mid exposure] |
2024-07-08 04:19:03.786 |
Last processed [ccf] |
2024-12-30 06:39:08.803 |
Version [ccf] |
0.7.292 |
Request |
|---|
CCF Downloads |
File URL |
Uploaded |
|---|---|---|
CCF Table |
2025-01-01 18:27:01.258 |
Time series¶
This section deals with providing the time series information for this object
Obs Dir |
First obs mid |
Last obs mid |
Number of ext |
Number of tcorr |
Seeing |
Airmass |
Mean Exptime |
Total Exptime |
SNR[Order 15 (#134 1.08um)] |
SNR[Order 60 (#89 1.63um)] |
DPRTYPEs |
ext_files |
tcorr_files |
Request ext files |
Request tcorr files |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023-05-20 |
2023-05-21 01:41:25.754 |
2023-05-21 06:48:08.686 |
70 |
70 |
2.193 |
1.110 |
250.799 |
17555.895 |
286.470 |
379.354 |
OBJ_SKY |
70 |
70 |
||
2024-07-07 |
2024-07-07 22:46:53.752 |
2024-07-08 04:19:03.786 |
150 |
149 |
1.260 |
1.129 |
122.613 |
18391.890 |
222.308 |
282.819 |
OBJ_SKY |
150 |
149 |
Debug¶
This section has various debug plots from APERO products
Telluric map¶
Telluric map of e2dsff_tcorr_A files.Files are low-passed and corrected for the stars motion. The QC is displayed to the right of the image - in purple are the files that passed, in orange the files that failed.
Shape QC plot¶
Shape parameters varying in time.dx is a shift along the order, dy is a shift across orders, [[A,B],[C,D]] is an affine transformation matrix.
wfpdrift plot¶
Wavelength solution absolute CCF FP Drift [km/s]
Wave cavity (c0) plot¶
Wave cavity polynomial coeffs=0
Maximum Saturation level plot¶
Maximum saturation level measured at time of extraction
Measured effective readout noise before extraction¶
Measured effective readout noise before extraction
APERO Processing Debug Plot¶
Plotting the version and processed date from the header from APERO. Note that offline reductions should lead to a straight line, while online reductions should be roughly a one-to-one with the Date axis.
APERO Calibration times plot¶
Computed time between observation and calibration used. Some calibrations arereference calibrations (in purple) and thus diverge from the reference night, others should always be from the same night (orange) unless no calibration was taken that night in which case the closest calirbation in time should have been used.